Current role · Creative strategy · under NDA
One angle, three roofing markets
I run 25 US roofing and home improvement lead gen accounts on my own, about $70K a month in spend. In three of those accounts, the top ad came from the same creative angle, briefed for a different format each time.
Top ad per account · Meta Ads Manager · last 30 days (Aug 24 to Sep 22, 2026)
| Client | Format | Lead type | Spend | Leads | CPL |
| A | Static image | Website | $1,297.77 | 35 | $37.08 |
| B | Collage image | Instant form | $711.59 | 16 | $44.47 |
| C | Video | Instant form | $2,138.54 | 47 | $45.50 |
Lead types differ, so the CPLs aren't a like for like comparison. Client B's ad started Sep 9, so it covers about two weeks. Offers and client names are withheld under NDA.
The angle
- Hook: say out loud the question the homeowner is already asking about the offer, framed as "How?"
- Body: answer it with why it's possible: fair pricing, lower overhead, quality materials, no corners cut
- Voice: owner led, a real person explaining, not a brand claim
- CTA: Learn More
My 3M's read: the desire is a new roof without being overcharged or shortchanged. The audience is Solution Aware, already comparing roofers. Plain price claims are worn out in this category, so the ad adds a "how": lower overhead explains the price and removes the doubt.
The three creative briefs
Brief 1 · Static · Client A (General Offer Image 2)
Visual: one roof or crew photo, focused on the project, with the offer as large, easy to read text.
Angle: fair pricing, lower overhead, quality materials, no corners cut.
Brief 2 · Collage · Client B
Visual: a few clear roof and installation photos, with the offer as the main message.
Angle: the owner explains that a smaller, efficiently run company can price fairly without cutting corners.
Brief 3 · Video · Client C
Open: an owner style hook straight to camera.
Middle: roof and crew footage while the owner explains that price depends on roof size, difficulty and materials, then the quality standards.
End: the offer on screen and an invitation to learn more.
What I'd do next
- Client A: frequency was 2.66 on a reach of 6,641 for the top ad, Aug 24 to Sep 22, 2026. That alone doesn't prove fatigue, so the next step is a test: a fresh visual on the same angle.
- Client B: a handful of ads carry the results. Move budget toward the proven angle and cut ads that spend without leads.
- All three: track which leads become booked inspections and sales, and judge each ad on cost per customer, not CPL alone.
Newer Client A data: from Jul 16 to Sep 29, 2026, Client A's 15 static ads brought 191 leads at $30.99 CPL from $5,919.68. The full breakdown is in the Client A case file.
See the ads: the case files for Client A, Client B and Client C hold the Ads Manager screenshots and each creative brief.