Cheenu Malig

Active

Book a free 30 min reviewBook a review

Case file · Kitchen and bath remodeling · US · Managed account

Client E

Exhibit A: Client E ad table in Meta Ads Manager, watermarkedExhibit A · Client E ad table
Industry:
Kitchen and bath remodeling, US
Role:
Managed account
Reviewed:
80 campaigns, Aug 2023 to Sep 2026
Spend reviewed:
$186,820
Judged on:
Cost per submitted application

Cheap leads aren't cheap customers. This account had spent $186,820 across 80 campaigns, and most of it was judged on cost per lead. That number was pointing the budget at the wrong ads.

So I changed the question. For every ad: what does the business pay for a submitted application, the step where a homeowner actually applies for a remodel? The answer rearranged the whole account.

The account's all time cost was $400.90 per application. Scroll to see which ads were driving that, and which ones fixed it.

Exhibit B Same six ads, two rankings

Ranked by cost per leadLower is better
Free fridge · short video
Bathroom client asset
Free fridge · kid drawing
Kitchen showcase video
Family owned
Bathroom collage
All time, 80 campaigns$400.90
3 campaigns active at the Sep 23 review$193.05

Six selected ads from the Client E ad table, Aug 2023 to Sep 2026.

01 · The usual view

Ranked by cost per lead, the bathroom client asset ad is second best in the account at $32.98 a lead. Most buyers would put more budget behind it.

02 · The view that matters

Rank the same six ads by cost per application. The bathroom ad drops to last: $461.71 per application.

03 · Why

It logged only 3 applications from its 42 leads. The two free fridge ads logged as many applications as leads: 44 for 44, and 18 for 18. The ad was easy to click and easy to fill in, so it attracted people who weren't ready.

04 · The benchmark

Every ad is now judged on cost per application first. The 3 campaigns active at the Sep 23, 2026 review ran at $193.05, against $400.90 across the account's full history since Aug 2023. Different campaigns and dates, so it's a benchmark, not a before and after.

Exhibit C The briefs that came out of it

The free fridge offer

44 applications at $35.64

Top ad. "Full remodel" comes before the bonus, which filters out small jobs. It logged 44 applications for 44 leads.

[BRIEF]A refrigerator included with a qualifying full kitchen remodel

The kitchen showcase

116 leads · $238.35 per application

Volume driver. It earns attention, but it logged about 1 application for every 6 leads. Next: say who the offer is for before the CTA.

[BRIEF]A real local project walkthrough, human vs montage test

Qualify before the click

$32.98 CPL → $461.71 per application

Keep the original as a control. Show service area, project type and readiness before the form. CPL may rise. That's fine if cost per application falls.

[BRIEF]Lead quality fix for the bathroom client asset ad

Exhibit D Straight from Ads Manager

Client E campaign table, Aug 23, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026: $186,820.21 spend, 466 applications, $400.90 per application

Campaign table · Aug 23, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 · $186,820.21 spend, 466 applications

Client E ad table, Aug 23, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026

Ad table · Aug 23, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 · tap any image to open it full size

Verdict

Judge every ad on the step that makes the business money. Here that's the application. The 3 campaigns active at the Sep 23, 2026 review ran at $193.05 per application, against $400.90 across the account's full history.

Book a free 30 min review of your account

Keep scrolling
for the next case

Next case file · Roofing · 191 leads at $30.99 from 15 static adsClient A